Timeline of Female Deacons in the RPCNA
In 1888 the RPCNA became the first conservative Presbyterian body to ordain women to the diaconate.
- 1845: Synod resolves the deacon/trustee controversy: rejects trustees, affirms deacons for both poor relief and temporal management.1
- c. 1845: James McLeod Willson publishes The Deacon, defending the diaconate as a distinct, divinely instituted office.1
- 1870sā1880s: RPCNA expands into foreign and domestic missions (Syria, Cyprus, Selma, Indian Territory); women take on substantial operational roles in missionary societies and benevolence work.23
- 1888: McKeesport, Pennsylvania congregation, “feebly equipped with male members,” elects Martha J. McConnell, known for “efficiency in temperance and evangelistic work,” as deacon. Presbytery refers the question to Synod.45
- 1888: North Cedar Ladies’ Missionary Society congratulates McConnell, urging “conscientious acceptance” and asking Synod to “lay no obstacles in her way.”6
- 1888: Synod votes 93ā24 that ordaining a woman deacon is “in harmony with the New Testament and the Constitution of the Apostolic Church.”5
- 1888: Synod committee publishes “Women and the Deacon’s Office,” arguing from Romans 16:1 (Phoebe as diakonos) and 1 Timothy 3:11 (“women likewise”) for women in the diaconate while excluding them from ruling office and church courts.7
- 1888: D.B. Willson defends women’s ordination to the diaconate in a seminary lecture, citing demographic need and women’s proven reform work.4
- 1888: Thomas P. Stevenson surveys early-church deaconesses, marshaling patristic and conciliar evidence while confining their roles to non-priestly functions.8
- 1888: D.S. Faris attacks the decision, alleging Synod acted by “sentimental overflow” and warning of a slippery slope toward women in all offices.9
- 1888: Christian Nation editorial places the decision alongside Covenanter reform causes (political dissent, abolition, prohibition) as the next question “pressing for solution.”5
- 2002: RPCNA Synod reaffirms women deacons: deacons hold “no legislative or judicial powers”; the diaconate is “neither a ruling nor a teaching office.”10